The issue came up recently in the teacher credential class
that I teach concerning procrastination and the benefits of working under
pressure. Sure, we all work harder when we know a deadline is approaching, and
hard work produces better results. But the more we can do as teachers to
eliminate procrastination both in our students and in ourselves the better and
more effective educators we will become. Part of that is recognizing the
importance and value of review and reflection as part of the creative academic process
when we design our assignments, and building in “think time” for our students.
In production classes we use the pre-production, production,
and post-production model. Students should schedule an equal amount of time for
each of these three steps. The pre-production step includes brainstorming and
writing, usually in small groups. The production step includes creating the
actual project as designed during pre-production. The post-production step
includes editing, refining, and polishing the final product. Most students hate
the pre-production step, and want to jump right into production. This is like
going on a car vacation without a map of how to arrive at your
destination. And too often
post-production suffers from lack of remaining time.
This same model can easily be applied to any subject taught
or project assigned in any class at any educational level. The three steps can
be simplified into: planning, applying, and revising. The key to success is
making sure that ample time is budgeted to each step in order to insure the
deadline is met. Too often students have difficulty getting started. They have
lots of good ideas, but trust few of their ideas to actually work. Once
students set their project into motion a lack of disciplined time management
leaves little time left over for the editing and polishing.
That is where procrastination hurts the most: not allowing
enough time to work out the finer details. Once the production process is
complete, students need to pause, relax, and reflect, before beginning the
revising process. Just because the project is not in the forefront of the
students’ thinking does not mean that their brains are not still working on it
in the background. In fact, some of my best ideas on making improvements to a
project have come up when I am not actively working on that project. It’s that
think time that makes the difference to the end result.
But we eliminate any chance of taking advantage of think
time if we have procrastinated so badly that the best we can do is simply
finish with “something.” Sometimes that is necessary, but always it is
unfortunate. Teachers need to structure their assignments and their classes so
that students can take advantage of the benefits think time adds to their work.
Strict and regular deadlines throughout the production process that build in
think time are a great way to make sure students not only learn excellent time
management, but also a process that encourages them to produce their very best.
No comments:
Post a Comment